• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Allies
    • Board of Directors
    • Guiding Principles
    • Member Organizations
    • Mission & History
  • Membership
  • Request a Speaker
  • Volunteer
  • Contact Us
  • Contribute

The Colorado Coalition

Envision a World without Nuclear Weapons

Click Here to Contribute

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Featured
  • Events
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Perspective
  • Subscribe

More and More Pits–For What?

May 11, 2018 By Bob Kinsey

Feds split ‘pit’ work between LANL and S.C.
By Mark Oswald And Michael Coleman / Journal Staff Writers
Published: Thursday, May 10th, 2018 at 3:37pm
Updated: Thursday, May 10th, 2018 at 10:11pm

Pit production will remain at Los Alamos National Laboratory, but a bigger number of the nuclear weapons cores will be made the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Caroline. (EDDIE MOORE/JOURNAL)
Copyright © 2018 Albuquerque Journal
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The majority of the nation’s production of plutonium cores for nuclear weapons would take place at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina under a plan certified by the Nuclear Weapons Council and announced Thursday, but a lesser number of plutonium “pits” would still be made at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
The council has accepted a National Nuclear Security Administration recommendation to repurpose a facility at Savannah River to make 50 pits a year coupled with “an enduring mission” to make at least 30 pits per year at Los Alamos, currently the only place in the country set up to make the softball-sized cores.
The two-pronged approach “is the best way to manage the cost, schedule, and risk of such a vital undertaking,” according to a statement Thursday by Ellen M. Lord, Department of Defense undersecretary for acquisition and sustainment and chairwoman of the Nuclear Weapons Council, and Lisa E. Gordon-Hagerty, Department of Energy undersecretary for nuclear security, administrator of the NNSA and a member of NWC.
“Furthermore, by maintaining Los Alamos as the Nation’s Plutonium Center of Excellence for Research and Development, the recommended alternative improves the resiliency, flexibility, and redundancy of our Nuclear Security Enterprise by not relying on a single production site,” the statement said.
At her confirmation hearing in February, Gordon-Hagerty told Congress that ramping up plutonium pit production was the most important issue on her agenda as head of the nation’s nuclear weapons complex.
Democratic members of New Mexico’s congressional delegation, who had been lobbying fiercely to keep and expand the plutonium work at LANL, said the announcement was both good and bad for the weapons lab.
In a joint statement, Sens. Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich and Reps. Michelle Lujan Grisham and Ben Ray Luján lamented that pending plans to build new underground “modules” for making the plutonium pits at LANL will be halted.
“While we are pleased that Los Alamos National Laboratory will remain the Research & Development Plutonium Center of Excellence and will be allowed to expand their plutonium pit production capability with a new multi-billion investment, halting the long-planned modular expansion of LANL’s facilities for plutonium pit production will set back our military’s life extension programs and stretch the Lab’s existing facilities and workforce to its limits,” the New Mexico lawmakers said.
“Instead of wasting billions of dollars exploring the construction of a new facility that will likely never be completed somewhere else, the Department of Energy should immediately move forward with the new, modular plutonium facilities at Los Alamos – as originally endorsed by both Congress and the Nuclear Weapons Council.”
Modernization plan
The NNSA is under a congressional mandate to make 80 pits a year by 2030 as part of an extensive nuclear weapons modernization plan. It has been studying whether LANL or somewhere else is the best place to reach that goal.
The possibility that pit manufacturing – which comes with billions of dollars in funding for operations and facilities and hundreds of jobs – might take place somewhere other than Los Alamos was first reported by the Journal last year, after NNSA officials made brief mention of the idea at public meeting in Santa Fe.
Udall and Heinrich inserted an amendment into the latest defense budget bill that made it more difficult for NNSA to move pit production from LANL, requiring the Nuclear Weapons Council’s approval. The amendment also set a deadline of this week for action.
The U.S. manufactured thousands of pits during the Cold War at the old Rocky Flats facility in Colorado.
No new pits have been made since 2011, when LANL completed the last of 29 for Navy submarine missiles. The most ever made at Los Alamos in a year is 11.
Meanwhile, work at LANL was stalled by a series of mistakes, and the lab has faced scrutiny for safety lapses, including several in recent months involving plutonium and preliminary pit-making work.
Jay Coghlan, executive director of Nuke Watch New Mexico, said the NNSA announcement represented “in large part a political decision, designed to keep the congressional delegations of both New Mexico and South Carolina happy.”
“There is no explanation why the Department of Defense requires at least 80 pits per year, and no justification to the American taxpayer why the enormous expense of expanded production is necessary,” Coghlan said.
Late last year, a “summary of results” page from the NNSA study was leaked showing estimates that the goal of 80 pits a year could be reached quicker and more cheaply at sites other than Los Alamos, including Savannah River, despite several prior years of planning for new underground facilities for plutonium work at LANL.
New Mexico’s congressional delegation called the study “deeply flawed from the start.”
Old pits
Some critics maintain there is no need to make any new pits, with thousands produced in the past and now in storage that could be adapted for use. Former NNSA Director Linton Brooks recently proposed the use of old pits as an alternative if new production proved too difficult.
“No new pits are needed for any warhead,” said Greg Mello, executive director of the Los Alamos Study Group, another nuclear weapons watchdog organization. “In the longer run, government would be wise to focus on pit re-use, because there are thousands of usable pits sitting around.”
But Mello also said the NNSA’s decision “appears to be a rational one within the limits of existing law.”
“LANL can’t handle the industrial mission, period, and there was always going to be overlap in time between small pit production at LANL and the establishment of any new production site,” he said.
Thursday’s news release said a facility for pits at Savannah River Site will be created by converting the Mixed-Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility, or MOX.
The facility was conceived for conversion of weapons-grade plutonium from dismantled warheads into fuel for nuclear reactors as part of an agreement between the U.S. and Russia to dispose of tons of weapons-grade plutonium.
But the giant project, which broke ground more than a decade ago, has faced delays, litigation and costs ballooning from an early estimate of $4 billion to a projected $17 billion now. The Obama administration called for abandoning it.
South Carolina officials, including Gov. Henry McMaster, have been pushing to keep the MOX mission even as local officials in the Savannah River area, near Augusta, Ga., have been wooing the pit work, with positive resolutions passed by local governments.
But on Thursday, as the NNSA unveiled the pit production plan, U.S. Secretary of Energy Rick Perry executed a waiver to terminate MOX construction, according to a report in the Aiken Standard, a South Carolina newspaper.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Bob Kinsey

Primary Sidebar

Receive Instant Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to The Colorado Coalition and receive notifications of new events and posts by email.

Contact Us

Disarmament Quotes

It is my firm belief that the infinite and uncontrollable fury of nuclear weapons should never be held in the hands of any mere mortal ever again, for any reason. 

Mikhail Gorbachev, 1995

We seek the elimination one day of nuclear weapons from the face of the Earth. 

Ronald Reagan, Inaugural Address, January 21, 1985

Elimination of nuclear weapons, so naive, so simplistic, and so idealistic as to be quixotic? Some may think so. But as human beings, citizens of nations with power to influence events in the world, can we be at peace with ourselves if we strive for less? I think not. 

Robert McNamara Former U.S. Secretary of Defense

It is my fervent goal and hope…that we will some day no longer have to rely on nuclear weapons to deter aggression and assure world peace. To that end the United States is now engaged in a serious and sustained effort to negotiate major reductions in levels of offensive nuclear weapons with the ultimate goal of eliminating these weapons from the face of the earth. 

Ronald Reagan, October 20, 1986

“Everything I did at Kings Bay was a result of my faith and my commitment to challenge the idols whose only purpose is to destroy human life on an unimaginable scale. I went to Kings Bay to use my body to refuse to bow down to these idols. I went to try to bring attention to the idolatry that it is requiring of our nation and its people. I went in a spirit of prayer and repentance. I went in hope that this witness might invite other people to reflect on the obscenity and on the idolatry that it is before God.”

Liz McAlister Kings Bay Protestor 2019

Now, understand, this matters to people everywhere. One nuclear weapon exploded in one city -– be it New York or Moscow, Islamabad or Mumbai, Tokyo or Tel Aviv, Paris or Prague –- could kill hundreds of thousands of people. And no matter where it happens, there is no end to what the consequences might be -– for our global safety, our security, our society, our economy, to our ultimate survival. 

Former President Barack Obama, April 5, 2009

Through the release of atomic energy, our generation has brought into the world the most revolutionary force since prehistoric man's discovery of fire. This basic force of the universe cannot be fitted into the outmoded concept of narrow nationalisms. For there is no secret and there is no defense; there is no possibility of control except through the aroused understanding and insistence of the peoples of the world. We scientists recognise our inescapable responsibility to carry to our fellow citizens an understanding of atomic energy and its implication for society. In this lies our only security and our only hope - we believe that an informed citizenry will act for life and not for death. 

Albert Einstein, January 22, 1947

We are prone to self-righteousness if we call ourselves peacemakers, and yet do not perceive how the peace issue cuts through all the economic and social issues that we often try to keep separate. If the race for nuclear arms is encouraged by our fear of losing the affluent ways of life that we have taken for granted, then we must see how our fears and desires have left so many other human beings naked and hungry.

Malsolm Warford "The Church's Role in a Nuclear Age

We endorse setting the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons and working energetically on the actions required to achieve that goal ... 

George P. Shultz, William J. Perry, Henry A. Kissinger and Sam Nunn, January 4, 2007

There are still thousands of warheads loaded on operational systems and standing on high states of alert on virtually hair-trigger posture. And you have to ask yourself: Why is that? Who is the enemy? What is the threat? 

U.S. General Lee Butler Former Commander in Chief, U.S. Strategic Air Command in 1991-92

A world free of the threat of nuclear weapons is necessarily a world devoid of nuclear weapons…. Nuclear weapons pose an intolerable threat to humanity and our habitat…. Others subscribe to Churchill’s assertion ‘Peace is the sturdy child of terror.’ For me, such a peace is a wretched offspring, a peace that condemns us to live under a dark cloud of perpetual anxiety, a peace that codifies mankind’s most murderous instincts….The beast must be chained, its soul expunged, its lair laid waste.

General Lee Butler Former Commander, Strategic Air Command, April 28, 1996

Viewing Trinity Test July 16,1945: "Now we are all Sons of Bitches"

Kenneth Bainbridge Deputy Director

[T]he use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender. . . . [I]n being the first to use it, we . . . adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.

5-Star Admiral William D. Leahy Chief of Staff to President's Roosevelt and Truman, leader of Combined US-UK Chiefs of Staff during WWII

So far as I can see, the atomic bomb has deadened the finest feeling that has sustained for ages. There used to be so-called laws of war, which made it tolerable. Now we know the truth. War knows no law except that of might. The atomic bomb brought an empty victory but it resulted for the time being in destroying the soul of Japan. What has happened to the soul of the destroying nation is yet too early to see... 

Mahatma Gandhi from The Essential Gandhi, Louis Fisher, ed.

Over the past 15 years, the goal of elimination of nuclear weapons has been so much on the back burner that it will take a true political breakthrough and a major intellectual effort to achieve success in this endeavor.

Mikhail Gorbachev, January 31, 2007

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending he sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children...This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the cloud of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron." --spoken to the American Society of Newspaper Editors 1953

Dwight Eisenhower US President 1953-1961

Copyright © 2023 The Colorado Coalition


A Website by Arielle Elak Design
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.