• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Allies
    • Board of Directors
    • Guiding Principles
    • Member Organizations
    • Mission & History
  • Membership
  • Request a Speaker
  • Volunteer
  • Contact Us
  • Contribute

The Colorado Coalition

Envision a World without Nuclear Weapons

Click Here to Contribute

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Featured
  • Events
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Perspective
  • Subscribe

TCC supports the BAN Treaty

October 6, 2017 By The Colorado Coalition

The United States of America is the only nation on the planet to use a Nuclear Weapon against the advice of numbers of the nuclear physicists who helped develop it. They had worked on it strictly as a deterrent to possible development of the same weapon by Germany who had surrendered for months prior to Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9) cities in Japan, an adversary which did not possess the bomb. There is considerable evidence that the real reason for using the bomb was to demonstrate to the Soviet Union, which had entered the war against Japan only days before (August 1), they (USSR) had better not be tempted to use their superior conventional power in Europe in the post-war period. There is also considerable evidence that Japan surrendered quickly (they had been seeking terms of surrender since early Spring 1945) not because of the A-bombs (over 60% of Japanese cities had been devastated by US conventional bombing in the past 6 months of the war and real news of what a Nuclear Weapon had done differently had not had time to be evaluated by Tokyo) but that they preferred surrender to US rather than the USSR. (The Japanese had humiliated the Russian military in 1905.)
Following the Japanese surrender major Christian theologians in the US condemned the use of the Atomic Bomb. Scientist attempted to create a moral pressure (Moral Rearmament) against use of their knowledge for further development of the bomb. The US Government on the one hand made efforts to create within the UN an international system of control of the weapon. On the other it basked in its unilateral possession of the bomb up till Soviets also gained a weapon. It made use of that possession in its foreign policy decisions. Once the Soviets had the bombs (Atomic and later Thermonuclear) the US developed a deterrence strategy that was based on MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction). If someone were to use Nuclear weapons vs. US the US would always be able to assure nuclear destruction of the perpetrator in return. (This kind of deterrence thinking was in the mind of Einstein when he urged the US to develop nuclear weapons–a thought process not included later in the US decision to first use the bomb vs. a non-nuclear Japan. The American Public was sold this arms race (a balance of terror) as a matter of national defense and over the next 50 years expended well over 6 Trillion dollars of national treasure developing the “Nuclear Triad” a land-sea-air capability that would be able to survive nuclear attack and assure devastating response. At the same time it accepted the Non-Proliferation Treaty with its prohibition on other nations developing a nuclear capability while Pinocchio-like professing to a quick abolition of its own capability. But so long as there was a nation out there that could threaten a serious nuclear attack vs. the US we were told we could not eliminate ours. In actual fact there was only one nation the USSR capable of coming close. When the Cold War ended any real deterrence no longer required our huge arsenal and some nations in the Soviet sphere of influence actually decided on their side to abolish their nuclear capabilities. (ie Ukraine…). Others not in the Soviet block followed suit (ie Brazil, South Africa…).
But now the US Congress has funded the planned “modernization” of the US nuclear weapons complex and it will include not just deterrence but uses of nuclear weapons on the battlefield. And our Government has oppose the ratification of the BAN Treaty developed by 122 member nations of the UN. It has pressured NATO nations not to sign or ratify the treaty (in the interests of “national security”). None of the Nuclear Armed nations (including Israel who does not acknowledge its nuclear arsenal of 80 to 200 weapons) do not support the treaty all maintaining that it is to “idealistic ” and that nuclear weapons have kept the peace over the past 60 years. Really? Lets ask Libya, Syria, Iran, Yemen, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Colombia, former Yugoslavia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, etc. about that peace. Check out their graveyards! Ask those who have died from exposure to nuclear weapons production and testing in the Marshall Islands, Utah, Vermont, Colorado, Washington. What a boon!

Filed Under: Perspective

Primary Sidebar

Disarmament Quotes

Viewing Trinity Test July 16,1945: "Now we are all Sons of Bitches"

Kenneth BainbridgeDeputy Director Manhatten Project

“Everything I did at Kings Bay was a result of my faith and my commitment to challenge the idols whose only purpose is to destroy human life on an unimaginable scale. I went to Kings Bay to use my body to refuse to bow down to these idols. I went to try to bring attention to the idolatry that it is requiring of our nation and its people. I went in a spirit of prayer and repentance. I went in hope that this witness might invite other people to reflect on the obscenity and on the idolatry that it is before God.”

Liz McAlisterKings Bay Protestor 2019

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending he sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children...This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the cloud of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron." --spoken to the American Society of Newspaper Editors 1953

Dwight EisenhowerUS President 1953-1961

We are prone to self-righteousness if we call ourselves peacemakers, and yet do not perceive how the peace issue cuts through all the economic and social issues that we often try to keep separate. If the race for nuclear arms is encouraged by our fear of losing the affluent ways of life that we have taken for granted, then we must see how our fears and desires have left so many other human beings naked and hungry.

Malsolm Warford"The Church's Role in a Nuclear Age

A world free of the threat of nuclear weapons is necessarily a world devoid of nuclear weapons…. Nuclear weapons pose an intolerable threat to humanity and our habitat…. Others subscribe to Churchill’s assertion ‘Peace is the sturdy child of terror.’ For me, such a peace is a wretched offspring, a peace that condemns us to live under a dark cloud of perpetual anxiety, a peace that codifies mankind’s most murderous instincts….The beast must be chained, its soul expunged, its lair laid waste.

General Lee ButlerFormer Commander, Strategic Air Command, April 28, 1996

Copyright © 2025 The Colorado Coalition


A Website by Arielle Elak Design